Some claim that only women are ability-aspiring, which the author refutes as human beings in general are ability-aspiring and using this to single out females is a fallacy. The key difference between women and men is that women are usually attracted to needs while men seldom like a woman out of need. A male has a better chance of courting a female by fulfilling her needs when she requires them. Women generally have more needs than men, which is why consumerism focuses on them. Despite the promotion of female independence, women still tend to expect fulfillment, which is physiologically determined as they are inherently softer and more prone to exhaustion in competition compared to men. A man willing to meet a woman's needs is more appealing to her, not because women are materialistic but due to their greater susceptibility to tiredness. This is seldom the case with men, highlighting the disparity between the two genders.
Some people say that women are ability-aspiring. I think that's bullshit. Because human beings are ability-aspiring. Using human nature to explain females is a trick. It makes sense to use this logic to explain any group of people. But this charlatan's trick of astrology-like doctrines really makes no sense. What we're going to talk about is the psychology of women being different from men.
One of the biggest differences between women and men is that women are usually attracted to needs. Men rarely like a woman out of need, whereas it’s the other way around for women.
We know that a male's best chance of chasing a female is to swoop in, which indeed means that he gives a female what she needs when she needs it. And we also find that women tend to have more needs than men, and that’s why consumerism targets women. No matter how strong a woman is, she still wants to have her needs met. Even in modern society, which promotes female independence, women tend to be more prone to expect to be fulfilled. This is not something that can be changed by education, but something determined by physiology.
Women are inherently softer than men. They can be equally competitive, but they are more likely to feel exhausted. Anyone would like to be helped when he or she realise the opponent has an overwhelming talent. When competing with the top students, the slow students are always hoping that the teacher could help and give the answer. We all know that it's unwise to overrate yourself. For sure, the difference between men and women in terms of physical fitness is not that big. But it's enough to create more needs in women than in men.
Thus, a man who is willing to fulfil a woman's needs tends to be more attractive to women. Even if a woman doesn't need you to fulfil her needs, she will still be attracted to this quality of yours because there is a desire within her. It's not that women are materialistic or gold-digging. It's just that they really do get tired more easily.
And that is rarely the case with men. That's the difference between men and women.
So what aspects of women are men more likely to be attracted to? Please wait and read the next part.